tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671579349491474304.post4246030890635577915..comments2024-03-27T21:03:05.934-04:00Comments on Pride & Prejudice (2005) Blog: Picture Comparison: The Bennet Family (P&P '05 vs. P&P '95)Jeanehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07716623880055624574noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671579349491474304.post-72207725641352044122012-05-30T03:06:22.939-04:002012-05-30T03:06:22.939-04:00I second your opinion Jeane. I like the 2005 versi...I second your opinion Jeane. I like the 2005 version better, yes sisters looked like sisters. In the 1995 version every character looked a bit over aged for their parts. <br /><br />Lovely post!Pallavihttp://periodmoviesbox.blogspot.in/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671579349491474304.post-3272361918260619732010-06-30T22:21:01.460-04:002010-06-30T22:21:01.460-04:00I agree whole-heartedly with everything you said i...I agree whole-heartedly with everything you said in this post, Jeanne. <br /><br />Most of the 1995 P&P fans are fiercely defensive of their favourite version of the novel, and often very snarky towards fans of the 2005 version. I've learnt not to let that bother me. :-) They can have their preference and I can have mine.<br /><br />~EliseThe Editrixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01184804847476554759noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671579349491474304.post-49231169029908226062008-06-06T20:27:00.000-04:002008-06-06T20:27:00.000-04:00You're right Jeane, it's just your opinion. and ev...You're right Jeane, it's just your opinion. <BR/><BR/>and even though I haven't seen the '95 version yet, the the sisters of the 2005 version look more like sisters, than the sisters from the 1995 version, from just those pics. - my opinion :)<BR/><BR/>The Bennets just 'were' a really good family in the 2005 version. :)James Spzilmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12407129372984824054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671579349491474304.post-18791071014048232832008-05-14T22:41:00.000-04:002008-05-14T22:41:00.000-04:00Thanks for visiting this blog and for the comment....Thanks for visiting this blog and for the comment. <BR/><BR/>As for your comment, well, yes, I said it. Like I said, and will add here...in my opinion, there wasn't a perfect version for P&P screen adaptation even if the 2005 version was the one I personally prefer of all P&P versions and my all-time favorite. So, how can I be wrong with my opinion? Isn't it why it wasn't a fact, because it was an opinion. There was no right or wrong with it. But whatever, I could say the same with yours. So, in your opinion, "The 1995 BBC/A&E version is perfect." To you, it probably was, but I disagree. Doesn't make you wrong and I won't say you are either. I just think that, it's your opinion, after all. That's why I mentioned "preference" because you preferred it to be "perfect" doesn't mean I or the others think the same. Others may or may not agree with me, which is fine 'cause like I said, It was my opinion. Guess, we'll just have to agree to disagree. <BR/><BR/>Thanks again for posting your comments.Jeanehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07716623880055624574noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3671579349491474304.post-89409374460858481202008-05-13T23:31:00.000-04:002008-05-13T23:31:00.000-04:00You say, "There's no perfect version for P&P scree...You say, "There's no perfect version for P&P screen adaptation …" and you're wrong. The 1995 BBC/A&E version is perfect. Keep up the good fight, though.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com